
Every user is entitled to remove information, including official warnings, from his or her talk page. Bluewind 08:52, 28 April 2007 (UTC) Reply So your saying that cowardice and turpitude are the answer and not deletion? And incidently, I have nothing to hide, because hiding something implies guilt. Keep on mind that deletion is not answer but cowardice and turpitude. At least by deleting those complaints you indicate that your actions are not fair so you need to hide them.

DarkSaber2k 17:08, 28 April 2007 (UTC) Reply Dear user DarkSaber2k additionaly I have thouroughly investigated the edit history of your own talk page User_talk:DarkSaber2k so that I have found out that you regularly deletete talk page entries so that other people can not see that numerous complaints about your problematic Wikipedia editing behavior which can be described as agressive and arrogant deletionism. Next time you want to try and lecture somebody, it might be advisible to actually read up on the subject beforehand. WP:USER also states: You might want to add quotations that you like, as acceptable, so I did. One sentence is not excessive by any stretch of the imagination. WP:USER states that excessive use of a user page for non-wikipedia information is not allowed. Bluewind 08:25, 28 April 2007 (UTC) Reply Nor does it have to. And by the way you as a notable deletionst should above all consider deletion parts of your own Wikipedia user page, because information that " The Internet - Where Men are Men.and so are most of the Women" has nothing to do with your activity as Wikipedia editor.

DarkSaber2k 16:45, 20 April 2007 (UTC) Reply Dear user DarkSaber2k: first I must tell you that I am vivid player of Travian MMORTS, so I should reveal to you that Travian article is also made in other languages Wikipedias such as Català Dansk Español Français Galego Italiano Lëtzebuergesch Nederlands Polski Português Русский Suomi Svenska Türkçe 粵語 中文, -so dear user DarkSaber2k will you propose deletion also those other sites so that any mention of Travian is completely erased from Wikipedia and people worldwide are gratefuly saved from reading that insignificant articles? IMHO the discussion about deletion of some article should be placed on that articles discussion page and not on some users talk page. Please see Bjroinsons talk page for my response to this.
#TRAVIAN SERVER SCRIPT LEAGUE FULL#
These requires the input of an administrator and a full discussion.

They must be flexible to protect articles of minority interest such as this category. The speed at which these were proposed for SD suggests DarkSaber2k did not properly consider them, Travian, Ferion and Inselkampf as examples are long established articles and have large user bases.ĭarkSaber2k is either misinterpreting criteria and guidance of web notability as straight rules. The following articles were proposed for deletion:
